| 陈铭.国际科技期刊论文开放获取现状比较研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2022,(7):33~42 |
| 国际科技期刊论文开放获取现状比较研究 |
| A Comparative Study on Open Access of International Scientific Journals |
| 投稿时间：2022-07-10 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2022.07.006 |
| 中文关键词: 开放获取；开放科学；OA论文；预警期刊；国际比较 |
| 英文关键词: Open Access; Open Science; OA Paper; Journal under Early Warning; International Comparison |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1029 |
| 全文下载次数: 928 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中国、美国和欧盟是全球OA论文产出的核心力量，在全球视野下探索中、美、欧在OA论文发展上的特征和差异，为未来相关研究和实践提供必要的数据支持及阐释基础。本文基于2000—2021年WoS核心合集收录的OA论文文献数据，利用对比分析法，从多个维度对中、美、欧科研人员发表论文的OA现状进行国际比较研究。研究发现，虽然中国科研人员在发表OA论文方面呈现出良好的势头，但与美国和欧盟相比还存在许多差距，其中包括OA论文的学科分布结构较不均衡；大量OA论文发表在录用门槛低、具有潜在质量问题的预警期刊上；中国科研人员主导完成的OA论文影响力较低等。未来中国OA论文的高质量发展，不仅需要我国科研人员更加注重论文的水准，还需要我国相关机构制定系统全面的OA发展规划和相关科研评价体系，为推进我国OA进程提供完善的制度保障。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| China, the United States and the European Union contribute most to the global OA paper outputs. Exploring the characteristics and differences of OA paper among China, the United States and the European Union can provide necessary data support and empirical evidence for the further research and practice. Based on the OA publication dataset collected in Web of Science from 2000 to 2021, this study conducted a comparison on the status of OA in China, the United States and the European Union, from the perspectives of publication scale, OA type distribution, disciplinary distribution, journal distribution and paper impact by means of bibliometrics. Although the development of OA in China shows a good momentum, there are still some insufficiency compared with that in the European Union and the United States. This study claimed that the development of OA in China not only requires local researchers to pay more attention to the quality of publication, but also urges relevant institutions to formulate a systematic and comprehensive development plan for OA to provide institutional guarantee. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
